NDCP2 and ZDoom!

[Logan MTM]

I know NDCP2 is for Boom compatible Ports. But, ZDoom run Boom wads very well, evereybody know it. I think G/ZDoom will be the more used Ports to play NDCP2.
Now i ask...
Considering this fact, what do you guys think about make an GOOD TITLEMAP as KDiZD does?
I can do it!

Or better than that. Can i do it? *cool*

[ace]

I'm not sure about this. Since other ports (including Vanilla) will simply ignore the TITLEMAP, methinks, it wouldn't cause any incompatibility--however, I'm not sure if it's possible to include both the titlemap and the titlepic and have ZDoom use only the titlemap. Does that work?

Personally, I don't think we need it--it's just a title. And we certainly shouldn't need to base our standards upon those of other high-caliber projects (i.e. KDiZD, as you said), especially when those projects' intentions are very different from ours.

[Danimetal]

Nope for me Logan. I don´t even know what a titlemap is ( :P ) but I think we should stay within the limits of pure Boom stuff. You know, imagine I crank a few Legacy 3d sectors just because they won´t crash Boom and they can show in Legacy. That would be rather akward and wrong.

[Logan MTM]

Ahhhhhhhh :(

[Exl]

What could you possibly show in a titlemap? Choosing a part of one map above that of all the others isn't fair, and putting some map-ified (is that a word?) NDCP logo in it is just cheesy.

[Dutch Devil]

I agree stick to boom stuff leave Zdoom stuff out.

[Osiris's_Legacy]

@Ace: Ya, it would immediatly disregard the Titlepic and go straight to the Titlemap.

But seriously, I don't we really need one. This is for boom, not ZDoom.

[PumpkinSmasher]

I vote to stick with the Boom Stuff

[Danimetal]

How come there are only two votes then :P.

[FATAL]

The question is not neutral. It asks whether NDCP 2 deserves one, which I'm sure it does. However, judging by what you've said, I do not think that it should have one.

[Doom_Dude]

I don't see the point in having one.