View Full Version : NDCP2 and ZDoom!
July 23rd, 2007, 04:45 PM
I know NDCP2 is for Boom compatible Ports. But, ZDoom run Boom wads very well, evereybody know it. I think G/ZDoom will be the more used Ports to play NDCP2.
Now i ask...
Considering this fact, what do you guys think about make an GOOD TITLEMAP as KDiZD does?
I can do it!
Or better than that. Can i do it? *cool*
July 23rd, 2007, 05:00 PM
I'm not sure about this. Since other ports (including Vanilla) will simply ignore the TITLEMAP, methinks, it wouldn't cause any incompatibility--however, I'm not sure if it's possible to include both the titlemap and the titlepic and have ZDoom use only the titlemap. Does that work?
Personally, I don't think we need it--it's just a title. And we certainly shouldn't need to base our standards upon those of other high-caliber projects (i.e. KDiZD, as you said), especially when those projects' intentions are very different from ours.
July 23rd, 2007, 05:30 PM
Nope for me Logan. I don´t even know what a titlemap is ( :P ) but I think we should stay within the limits of pure Boom stuff. You know, imagine I crank a few Legacy 3d sectors just because they won´t crash Boom and they can show in Legacy. That would be rather akward and wrong.
July 23rd, 2007, 06:20 PM
July 24th, 2007, 02:09 AM
What could you possibly show in a titlemap? Choosing a part of one map above that of all the others isn't fair, and putting some map-ified (is that a word?) NDCP logo in it is just cheesy.
July 24th, 2007, 04:48 AM
I agree stick to boom stuff leave Zdoom stuff out.
July 25th, 2007, 05:02 AM
@Ace: Ya, it would immediatly disregard the Titlepic and go straight to the Titlemap.
But seriously, I don't we really need one. This is for boom, not ZDoom.
July 25th, 2007, 09:08 AM
I vote to stick with the Boom Stuff
July 25th, 2007, 09:11 AM
How come there are only two votes then :P.
July 25th, 2007, 09:49 AM
The question is not neutral. It asks whether NDCP 2 deserves one, which I'm sure it does. However, judging by what you've said, I do not think that it should have one.
July 25th, 2007, 10:27 AM
I don't see the point in having one.
vBulletin® v3.8.5, Copyright ©2000-2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.