Judge: Exposure Law Is Gender Specific!!!!!!!!!

[Boingo the Clown]

This is rather odd news.

http://apnews.myway.com/article/20061020/D8KSIKEG0.html

Toplessness was legalized here in Canada (Ontario at least) in 1996, because a (female) judge ruled that allowing men to remove their shirts and denying women the same right is descriminatory. That I can understand. Throwing out a case for indecent exposure because of a technicality regarding the wording of the law saying "his" rather then "his/her's" however strikes me as a little wierd.

BTW: If you plan to come to Canada to look for topless women, don't bother. Nobody actually does it, even if it is legal. In ten years I have only seen one woman walking around topless, and she was ffffffffffuuuuuuugly!

[Aliotroph?]

lol That's just funny. I find it funny that people are offended by nudity too.

[FATAL]

The boy complained?

[sLydE]

I'm a lumberjack and I'm OK....

[FATAL]

Haha, this is a perfect example of how tv ruins the youth!

[lucius octavion]

Haha! I don't have TV... anymore! :D

[Nomad]

I think I might take up playing basketball.

[Danimetal]

The boy complained?
Surely would catch on fire if he was made of wood.

[Raptor Jesus]

I'm sure if he had wood he wouldn't have complained XD

[rustyslacker]

"She threatened to do it every time he played basketball," and the parents called police, Norton said.

Lucky bastard.