PDA

View Full Version : Recession Looming?


unlawflcombatnt
August 28th, 2006, 11:57 AM
Retail Sales Decline: Harbinger of Recession?

The total nominal increase in July 2006 Retail Sales of $368.405 billion was 3.9% from July 2005's $354.414 billion. However, adjusting for inflation using the Bureau of Labor Statistics Consumer Price Index increase of 4.3%, this reduces the "real" Retail Sales change to -0.4%. However, the figures are even worse if gasoline station sales are subtracted. Subtracting July 2006's $43.918 billion in gasoline sales from the total nominal Retail Sales gives $327 billion. Subtracting July 2005's gasoline station sales from the total nominal Retail Sales (from July 2005) gives $319.53 billion. The difference between the July 2006's retail sales (ex. gasoline station) and July 2005's retail sales is only 2.3% in nominal (non-inflation-adjusted) dollars. Adjusting for inflation using the CPI increase of 4.3% puts the total at a -2.0%. In other words, excluding gasoline station sales, inflation-adjusted Retail Sales declined 2.0% from July of 2005.

This can be seen from the Retail Sales chart below copied from the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis report on Retail Sales (http://www.census.gov/svsd/www/marts_current.pdf)

http://i27.photobucket.com/albums/c190/unlawflcombatnt/8-11-06grphRetlSlsBEA-X.gif

General Merchandise Sales, which make up the biggest component of Retail Sales, showed a nominal increase in dollar sales of 4.3%. (underlined in blue on the chart above.) Again, this is exactly the same as the increase in the Consumer Price Index of 4.3%. Thus, the real change in General Merchandise Sales since July of 2005 is 0.0%. In other words, there has been NO growth in General Merchandise Sales since July of 2005.


The declining inflation-adjusted Retail Sales numbers are an ominous sign for the economy. They're even more concerning when gasoline station sales figures are not included, which leaves the remaining total for Retail Sales at 2% less than the previous July. Even with increased borrowing, consumers spending is declining. Since consumer spending is 70% of GDP growth, it makes further GDP growth difficult, if not impossible. With consumer borrowing ability expected to fall even further, consumer spending will likely decline further as well. Real wages have continued their steady decline since December 2002. Median real family income has declined every year since 1999. With decreasing consumer spending and decreasing consumer demand, labor demand can be expected to decline even further. The declining labor demand will result in further declines in both wages and employment, reducing consumer spending power even further.

Several noteworthy economists are suggesting a recession is on the way. Paul Krugman has discussed this in his most recent article titled Intimations of Recession (http://mparent7777.livejournal.com/11046250.html). Economist Nouriel Roubini, former member of Clinton's Council of Economic Advisors, has put the likelihood of Recession (http://www.rgemonitor.com/blog/roubini/139867) at 70% by the end of 2006. Another article from the Daily Reckoning (http://www.dailyreckoning.co.uk/article/09082006.html) has also laid out a strong case for an impending recession. All of these sources have provided a considerable amount of evidence to support their predictions. It appears that our "faith-based" economy is running out of steam. It can no longer be kept afloat by the hot air from the Housing Bubble and the alternate reality creation of the NeoCon-Artist spin machine.


unlawflcombatnt

EconomicPopulistCommentary (http://www.unlawflcombatnt.blogspot.com/)

Economic Patriot Forum (http://www.unlawflcombatnt.proboards84.com/)

_________________
The economy needs balance between the "means of production" & "means of consumption."

Aliotroph?
August 29th, 2006, 03:54 AM
And I say MEH! The people responsible for caring about this shit and drumming up all the crap over the numbers must be the stupidest people in the universe (apart from their ability to crunch numbers). Having an economy that does nothing but grow like crazy cannot happen indefinitely and is certainly not desirable from an environental or population standpoint.

I hear this stuff all the time from computer people. They get worried because sales aren't increasing at the same rate. They call this a slump in sales. The fact that they're increasing at all is pretty impressive considering everyone I know owns a computer (or six).

In an ideal world all economies would be healthy and stagnant. They wouldn't grow and people who make a living doing nothing but speculating on the fortunes of companies wouldn't exist because it wouldn't make a difference. Where one company screwed up, another would soon appear to sell the same stuff. Sadly, it'll never happen and we'll have business people forever worried that the population doesn't increase enough or that there isn't enough of a boom so they can afford more $1000 jackets every time some silly trend in suits changes.

Didn't we just have a recession anyway? :p

cchristianTP
September 27th, 2006, 05:56 PM
we're at the cliffdrop of one right now... BUY GOLD! i'm serious, the dollar is going down, the US economy is at an all time low (the thing about it being higher than erlier is actually bull, it's higher than that... 2002 i mean, that's still low) the big problem is the NeoCons... they keep it up with the tax cuts the economy will collapse! and in this deficit? america will be ruined...
tis is fact, I cite experts and proffessionalls

What do I care? "HA HA!! America is Gone!!! Europe is king again!" thats why! :) *is german*