PDA

View Full Version : Letter to the Editor


Nomad
July 14th, 2006, 05:15 PM
Wrote this letter to the editors of my city's newspaper. Will see what people have to say about it.

I'm writing regarding the situation with the Sheriff's Posse, and the activities that are occuring out there.

I myself am extremely offended that anyone would say that it is the bands' faults that these kids would be out there smoking or drinking or whatever.

First of all, perhaps it should be understood that not all of the shows are arranged by one of the bands. There are a couple people around town that set most of the shows up for us. So the argument in the first place that it is the bands' faults is completely outrageous.

Second of all, it is not any of our responsibilities to babysit what everyone are doing outside the venue.

We do not provide any of the alleged substances that are being used.

We do not let any of them into the venue itself with any of those substances that they acquire.

I am NOT saying that there is not a problem out there, but it is ludicrous to lay the blame on the bands putting on the show. We are there to provide entertainment--not to police. Whenever I myself see anyone doing anything like that, I tell them to stop. But other than that, there is not much we can do.

I DO however, think that this whole thing is being blown a bit out of proportion. One night in particular, three of the members of the Saddle Tramps club came out, and during their visit, there were three calls to the police station about kids allegedy going through the neighbors' yards--but none of us saw anything, and we were outside the entire time the offenses apparantly took place.

So I am willing to bet that a lot of the allegations being pressed on us are chalked up to the neighbors just simply being annoyed by the loud music.

I am not sure what to say for my closing statement, other than that many of the people in the community need to open their eyes and quit making judgements before the whole story. None of us in the bands are out there to cause problems--we just want to put on a show and have a good time. It is unfair to claim we are responsible for the actions that the people that come out to our shows, and pay money to come in--just to sit outside and smoke and drink. They are perfectly capable of taking their "party" elsewhere.

Frankly, it upsets me that they DO come out to our shows and cause problems--Because the 'Posse is pretty much the last place in town that is affordable to play at on a regular basis. Any show that I've played, there has hardly been enough money made to pay rent for the venue and paying for the sound techs that so nicely take time out of their day to provide a PA for us. We obviously aren't out there to make money. We're just out there doing what we love--making music.

And taking that away from us would be simply unAmerican. I hate to play the "Glittering Generalities" card, but it's true. The people causing problems, and shutting the venue down are both in violation of our Pursuit of Happiness.

rustyslacker
July 14th, 2006, 05:52 PM
It's a good piece of writing, Nomad. I don't think the newspaper guys will see it your way, though. You'll just have to wait and see.

Nomad
July 14th, 2006, 05:53 PM
Well, it's the newspaper's job to be unbiased. I expect my letter to be run whether they agree with it or not.

Doom_Dude
July 15th, 2006, 05:36 AM
Nice job with the letter. Surely the paper will run the letter.

KuriKai
July 15th, 2006, 05:45 AM
Well, it's the newspaper's job to be unbiased. I expect my letter to be run whether they agree with it or not.
Only to what sells newspapers and what they want the public to know.

Nomad
July 15th, 2006, 10:52 AM
Yeah, I know I'm being a bit too hopeful expecting them to actually do what they're supposed to, but you're right.

Oh well. Wasn't in today's paper. Will see if it hits the Sunday paper.

FATAL
July 15th, 2006, 11:31 AM
You should be lucky if it hits the Sunday paper instead of Saturday, but as folks have already mentioned, the text you sent isn't something that will sell very well.

Nomad
July 15th, 2006, 11:43 AM
The Sheriff's Posse story is a pretty big hubbub in the community right now, though. Cheyenne is relatively small, so not much goes on here--but when something like this pops up, everyone knows about it. If WTE doesn't pick it up, someone will. I also sent the letter to the anchor on the local news station that has been dealing with the story.

Those of us in the local music scene will fight to the death to keep the 'Posse. If it gets closed, Cheyenne is going to be a bloodbath.

By the way. I find it interesting that when something doesn't have any kind of effect on someone, they don't care about it. I mean, this issue is massively impacting myself and many others of my community, but those of you who live elsewhere couldn't give two shits about what was going on.

Of course, then again, we're not starving children in Africa. That makes all the difference.

Doom_Dude
July 15th, 2006, 06:22 PM
I imagine some sap has to read through a lot of letters and then decide which ones gets in the paper. Maybe if your letter doesn't make it, then get one of your friends to send in a similar one.

Grazza
July 15th, 2006, 07:44 PM
A friend of mine wrote her PhD thesis (and some subsequent work) on letters to the editor. After some searching around, I found an abstract (http://www.journalsonline.tandf.co.uk/(nfgfsxrv5eyxa3554nzyww45)/app/home/contribution.asp?referrer=parent&backto=searcharticlesresults,1,7;) that briefly summarizes the basic criteria by which (in her view) editors tend to decide what to publish:
The paper identifies four rules for selection; referred to as the rules of relevance, brevity, entertainment and authority. First, the rule of relevance refers to the demand for the content of the letter to be "relevant", or respond to issues and events already on the agenda. The rule of brevity, in turn, encapsulates the requirement to write short, punchy letters that state the reader's view in less than 300 words. Thirdly, the rule of entertainment highlights how editors prefer spectacular, punchy letters. Finally, the rule of authority captures the rejection of ungrammatical writing, and letters written in unconventional styles. So, the conclusions would be, in order to have the best chance of being published:
1) Try to "hook" your letter onto topics that have been raised recently in the paper, perhaps in editorials.
2) Keep it short and to the point.
3) Make it entertaining and witty.
4) Don't write carelessly or quirkily.

rustyslacker
July 18th, 2006, 09:23 AM
Looks like Nomad covered #1 and #4 pretty well, Grazza.

Doom_Dude
July 23rd, 2006, 05:53 AM
I take it the letter didn't make it? :/

Nomad
July 23rd, 2006, 08:07 AM
No. The story hasn't made the paper, nor the channel 5 news in about a week. I think people realized on their own that it was being overblown.

Kristian
July 25th, 2006, 03:26 AM
Looks like Nomad covered [...] #4 pretty well, Grazza.
Well, for instance, he wrote "apparantly", so he obviously didn't run a spellchecker on the text.
Not that I think that's the reason why the letter was (presumably) rejected.